- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: why is WWL reporting Lee to start ?
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:06 pm to fouldeliverer
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:06 pm to fouldeliverer
I heard the same WWL report. It was Christian Garrick's daily sports report.....which in most cases are completely wrong. Seriously, some of the stuff he says in his reports makes even the casual sports enthusiast scratch his head.
To support his statement that Lee would start, Garrick inserted a clip of Bobby discussing what BOBBY would do with the quarterback situation....so that clip makes no sense at all.
To support his statement that Lee would start, Garrick inserted a clip of Bobby discussing what BOBBY would do with the quarterback situation....so that clip makes no sense at all.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:07 pm to CigarLovingTiger
quote:
logic
does not compute, its Lesticles were talking about here
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:07 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:
What gives you the confidence to start a quarterback who is statistically the worst in the NCAA and what message does this send the team about on field performance dictating playing time.
He just stared at me like he hated me said uh...for about two seconds then said that JJ is the reason that Ridley is leading the SEC in rushing but Lee competes hard in practice or some shite.
well done!
He's way too used to sunshine pumpers being there.
Of course he had no answer because its logically unjustifiable.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:13 pm to BobBoucher
One of the lineman simply had enough and was pushed into JJ's leg somehow at practice.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:14 pm to BobBoucher
The problem with the stats is JJ just happened to be on the field when Ridley broke his two big runs.
1 was the first play of a drive where Ridley made a great cut.
The second was on a 2nd and 2 in the 3rd where he made another great move.
It had nothing to do with JJ. Take those 2 runs out and the numbers are almost identical between when the two QBs are in.
With JJ:
9 for 34 yards
With Lee:
11 for 39 yards
That isn't that big of a deal. Given the fact Ridley lost a huge run on the first drive Lee was in because of Barksdale's hold, I'd say the numbers aren't that different.
In the end, Les will do what Les is going to do. We just have to accept that even if it means failure for this team.
1 was the first play of a drive where Ridley made a great cut.
The second was on a 2nd and 2 in the 3rd where he made another great move.
It had nothing to do with JJ. Take those 2 runs out and the numbers are almost identical between when the two QBs are in.
With JJ:
9 for 34 yards
With Lee:
11 for 39 yards
That isn't that big of a deal. Given the fact Ridley lost a huge run on the first drive Lee was in because of Barksdale's hold, I'd say the numbers aren't that different.
In the end, Les will do what Les is going to do. We just have to accept that even if it means failure for this team.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:17 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:this type of crap is just one of the reasons that I strongly dislike Less....
is WWL reporting Lee to start ?
What gives you the confidence to start a quarterback who is statistically the worst in the NCAA and what message does this send the team about on field performance dictating playing time.
He just stared at me like he hated me said uh...for about two seconds then said that JJ is the reason that Ridley is leading the SEC in rushing but Lee competes hard in practice or some shite.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:19 pm to Nawlens Gator
quote:
WWL reported this morning that JJ was starting. Maybe hurt in practice?
Maybe one of the DL players hate to see JJ start, that's why he tried to injure JJ in pratice, maybe???
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:26 pm to learnthehardway
maybe Lex Luther kidnapped the president and jordan had to go save the day.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:27 pm to LSUMafia
who cares. everyone is trying to mash numbers. its pretty simple. when you have a threat to run, alot of times you will "spy" that qb with a defensive player. blitzes are more conservative. it doesnt matter how bad JJ throws the damn ball, he is a threat with his feet..he has 4.6 speed, who fricking cares...with lee in the game, and no footspeed more blitz packages are thrown in and thats when you go over the top...which is EXACTLY what we did the last drive against Tennessee. Both bring their own skill sets but the running game will always be better with JJ in i dont give a frick what yall say ive played QB since i was 5 and thats just how it is. Lee is the pass threat, JJ is the Run threat. Who cares who starts, Lee will see the majority of the snaps so everyone can stop frickin PMSing and booing when JJ gets in because its for a reason, 50% of his struggles are because of you motherfrickers on here that dog one of our own. why the frick would anyone wanna play qb for some of you stupid fricks.."frick yall ill play for myself"...and thats EXACTLY the mindframe he is in right now. Congrats. Ive seen people dog him at school, if i was him if hit yall in the fricking mouth. Same thing with Lee a few years ago...no player deserves that unless hes a professional, no one wants to represent you when you dont represent him.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:28 pm to Live2CTigersWin
quote:
WWL
unreliable, vanilla, bland, scared of offending anything or anyone.
I didn't hear the report because I haven't listened to that drivel in 3 years.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:28 pm to JW1LL
quote:
it doesnt matter how bad JJ throws the damn ball, he is a threat with his feet..he has 4.6 speed, who fricking cares.
I know someone faster.....
And they play QB too.....
Can you guess who it is?
Bench JJ.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:31 pm to CptBengal
Theres obviously is a reason he is not playing QB...and me or you will never know unless we are in the practices. Rumor has it Shep didnt even wanna play QB..hmmm ever think of that?
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:32 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
The problem with the stats is JJ just happened to be on the field when Ridley broke his two big runs.
1 was the first play of a drive where Ridley made a great cut.
The second was on a 2nd and 2 in the 3rd where he made another great move.
It had nothing to do with JJ. Take those 2 runs out and the numbers are almost identical between when the two QBs are in.
With JJ:
9 for 34 yards
With Lee:
11 for 39 yards
That isn't that big of a deal. Given the fact Ridley lost a huge run on the first drive Lee was in because of Barksdale's hold, I'd say the numbers aren't that different.
In the end, Les will do what Les is going to do. We just have to accept that even if it means failure for this team.
Agree 100%
The idiots yesterday were trying to attribute Ridley's success to JJ in that stat thread. I've never seen such an obtuse and willfully stupid analysis of data in my life.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:32 pm to JW1LL
Everyone keeps saying that Lee will get more snaps. As far as i know he will alternate with JJ. So the breakdown of how many times you see one or the other qb really depends on two things, one who starts the ball game. And two how many possesions total we have on offense. You also have to take into account the amount of time of possesion for both teams. If its in favor of Fla, than i dont know how many series either qb would have. And lets say one qb from LSU drives the lengths of the field and we hold on to the ball for a very long time that posession. That would also eliminate the chances of the other qb seeing the field.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:33 pm to CptBengal
JWILL while I don't disagree at all with the rant against the arse holes dogging him out, his play was shite before the dogging started. He just isn't that good man.
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:33 pm to JW1LL
quote:
who cares. everyone is trying to mash numbers. its pretty simple. when you have a threat to run, alot of times you will "spy" that qb with a defensive player.
Dude really? You really think that people are spying JJ?
He's not Vick. The one long run he had was a fluke. He hasn't been that consistent of a runner.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:37 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
coach miles radio show is in code and ya'll are too dense to understand that. it has been leaked, however, and the WWL staff was able to deciphor some of it. much of it is still being worked out by the on staff cryptologists that have been hired exclusivly for that purpose. expect more revelations later. hopefully, the coaching staff won't realize the code is being broken and we will get other prize pieces of info. in the coming weeks
There's an Enigma machine on display at the WWII Museum in N.O. Maybe WWL has access to it...
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:37 pm to TigerFanNKaty
im not saying hes good, at all. but if anyone knows football, you know that with a mobile QB, spreads the defense out. and our coach wants to utilize that. so be it.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:38 pm to Powerman
I guarantee UF isn't worried about JJ beating them with his legs.
Posted on 10/7/10 at 3:39 pm to Powerman
quote:
He's not Vick. The one long run he had was a fluke
All part of the master plan, hes just been disguising his elusiveness and speed since 2008.
You guys need to get your minds right.
That career 2.3 ypc is all just 1 big mind frick for the home stretch this year
This post was edited on 10/7/10 at 3:40 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News