- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miles's comments regarding 3rd and 8 are disturbing
Posted on 9/30/10 at 4:20 pm to just me
Posted on 9/30/10 at 4:20 pm to just me
When a person resorts to emoticons and claims that they are "laughing," that is typically a sign that they have been bested in rational argument.
Let's summarize.
You said "Lee played worse in 2009" than JJ did last week. Now, let's investigate whether there is any rational basis for that:
(1) Compare Lee's one 2009 start to JJ's performance last week. This is the best available data because it compares and contrasts two games where the respective QB's were both appearing as starters. However, it offers no succour for your argument. Lee had better stats against La Tech, as demonstrated;
(2) Compare Lee's 2009 game by game performance to JJ's performance last week. This isn't a valid comparison, given that Lee wasn't the starter for many games and only appeared in garbage time or trying circumstances, but again there is no consistent support for your statement, as shown;
(3) Compare Lee's overall 2009 statistics to JJ's performance last week. Let's do that. In 2009, Lee was 16-40 with 12.3 YPC and 2 TD's and 1 INT. Last week, JJ was 10-22 with 7.5 YPC and 0 TD's and 2 INTS. Therefore, overall in 2009, Lee had a much better YPC and a vastly better TD to INT ratio than JJ had last week. Again, you lose.
Outcome: There is no basis for your statement. You are wrong. And not too smart.
Let's summarize.
You said "Lee played worse in 2009" than JJ did last week. Now, let's investigate whether there is any rational basis for that:
(1) Compare Lee's one 2009 start to JJ's performance last week. This is the best available data because it compares and contrasts two games where the respective QB's were both appearing as starters. However, it offers no succour for your argument. Lee had better stats against La Tech, as demonstrated;
(2) Compare Lee's 2009 game by game performance to JJ's performance last week. This isn't a valid comparison, given that Lee wasn't the starter for many games and only appeared in garbage time or trying circumstances, but again there is no consistent support for your statement, as shown;
(3) Compare Lee's overall 2009 statistics to JJ's performance last week. Let's do that. In 2009, Lee was 16-40 with 12.3 YPC and 2 TD's and 1 INT. Last week, JJ was 10-22 with 7.5 YPC and 0 TD's and 2 INTS. Therefore, overall in 2009, Lee had a much better YPC and a vastly better TD to INT ratio than JJ had last week. Again, you lose.
Outcome: There is no basis for your statement. You are wrong. And not too smart.
This post was edited on 9/30/10 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 9/30/10 at 4:44 pm to The312
quote:
When a person resorts to emoticons and claims that they are "laughing," that is typically a sign that they have been bested in rational argument.
That would be me laughing at the absurdity of your completely irrational argument that using emoticons is a sign that someone has lost the debate.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News