Started By
Message

re: Miles's comments regarding 3rd and 8 are disturbing

Posted on 9/30/10 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 9/30/10 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

quote:

Except that Lee did play worse in 2009.
No. He didn't.

Against LaTech, Lee had more yards (105), more TD's (1), and fewer INT's (0) than Jefferson had against WVU.
Alabama (2009)
4/10 (40%) - 44 yards - 0 TDs and 1 Pick

La Tech (2009)
7/22 (32%) - 105 yards - 1 TD and 0 Picks

In both games, Lee threw for 40% or less. Jefferson hit over 45% of his passes against WV.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16817 posts
Posted on 9/30/10 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Alabama (2009)
4/10 (40%) - 44 yards - 0 TDs and 1 Pick


yeah, lets see... Lee has seen nothing but mop up duty, maybe 3 or 4 passes all season, then you throw him in against the best defense in college football (happened to win the BCS).

yeah, he gets a bit of a pass for this game.

Now, the Tech game, sure he stunk it up.

How is it fair to yank Lee after 1 poor performance (no pick 6s like in 08), but allow JJ to stay in after multiple poor performances and absolutely NO signs of improvement?

At least Lee wasnt throwing pick 6's which was his big knock in 08, so in his 1 chance, there was marginal improvement. he did take better care of the ball.
This post was edited on 9/30/10 at 2:05 pm
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 9/30/10 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Alabama (2009)
4/10 (40%) - 44 yards - 0 TDs and 1 Pick

La Tech (2009)
7/22 (32%) - 105 yards - 1 TD and 0 Picks

In both games, Lee threw for 40% or less. Jefferson hit over 45% of his passes against WV.


These arguments are becoming absurd. First of all, you cannot use the Bama game as a basis for comparison. Having to trot into Bryant Denny in the fourth quarter against the best defense in the nation (and the ultimate NC) on short notice after a week in which you do not get the majority of the snaps with the first team is not a viable basis for meaningful conclusions.

Second, the fixation on completion percentage is hilarious. If I told you before the game that you could have a QB who throws for 105 yards, 1 TD, and 0 INTs or a QB who would throw for 75 yards, 0 TD's, and 2 INTs, only a moron would choose the latter because he had a higher completion percentage on meaningless short throws. Good god. What sort of analysis yields the conclusion that you'll trade 13% increase in completions for fewer yards, fewer TD's, and more INTs.

Again, Jefferson played as poorly as a QB can last week, worse than Lee in 09. WORSE.
This post was edited on 9/30/10 at 2:08 pm
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 9/30/10 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

7/22 (32%) - 105 yards - 1 TD and 0 Picks

In both games, Lee threw for 40% or less. Jefferson hit over 45% of his passes against WV


The fact that he threw for over 25% fewer yards with three more completions might explain the difference in completion percentage. And of course the TD/Int margin of 1/0 compared to 0/2 is pretty significant as well.

Lastly, there is some difference between being the full-time starter and focus of practice reps and game planning for over a year and being a backup that the coaches have completely given up on and being suddenly thrust into the starting role due to injury.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram