Started By
Message

re: Which $500 or less .270 rifle?

Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:18 am to
Posted by Propagandalf
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
2528 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:18 am to
not always true, quality of glass matters too. when I was getting a scope for my Rem700 SPS .308 the 50mm (dont remember brand) was no where near as good of a picture in low light as the Nikon Buckmark 40mm I ended up buying.

as far as magnification goes keep in mind that if you get a 8-24x40 scope and a deer walks in your plot at 75 yards or under, its going to be hard to find him in your scope. i went with 4.5-14x40 and its perfect for all ranges a deer hunter would encounter, and a distance shooter too for that matter.

also you want a scope that holds its zero and where a click is 1/4 inch always. precision is key.
This post was edited on 8/2/10 at 11:20 am
Posted by TexasTiger
Katy TX
Member since Sep 2003
5325 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:44 am to
Hate to high jack the thread but how much did you give for your Nikon. I think I am going to upgrade the glass on my rifle this year and I am looking hard at the Nikons
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5892 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:47 am to
i have a 4.5-14x45 Burris on my 7wsm and i love that scope. I put down a doe from 345yds last year . nice open pipeline shot.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram