Started By
Message

re: Which $500 or less .270 rifle?

Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:54 pm to
Posted by Tiger 79
The Original Tiger 79
Member since Nov 2007
38056 posts
Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

INFIDEL


I would go with the 50mm one instead of the 40mm one for low light conditions
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 8/1/10 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

would go with the 50mm one instead of the 40mm one for low light conditions


That's something to think about. I personally don't have any 50mm scopes, but my dad has a couple as well as some friends and they are all happy with them. Main reason I don't have one is that other features that were important to me weren't available in the 50mm scopes.
Posted by Propagandalf
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
2528 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 11:18 am to
not always true, quality of glass matters too. when I was getting a scope for my Rem700 SPS .308 the 50mm (dont remember brand) was no where near as good of a picture in low light as the Nikon Buckmark 40mm I ended up buying.

as far as magnification goes keep in mind that if you get a 8-24x40 scope and a deer walks in your plot at 75 yards or under, its going to be hard to find him in your scope. i went with 4.5-14x40 and its perfect for all ranges a deer hunter would encounter, and a distance shooter too for that matter.

also you want a scope that holds its zero and where a click is 1/4 inch always. precision is key.
This post was edited on 8/2/10 at 11:20 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram