Started By
Message

re: Which $500 or less .270 rifle?

Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:47 pm to
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Bump for thoughts on which magnification scope should I be looking at? Also, do the differences between a $200 scope and a $400-500 scope justify a two-fold increase in cost?



For a beginner, the 3-9 will be all you need. I have a couple of higher power scopes but I like to shoot longer distances.

As far as the jump in cost, yes, in most cases it's well worth it. Scopes are a place where most people want to cut corners and it's very easy to justify in most cases for most people. Being new to shooting, you will probably not notice the difference between a cheaper scope and a higher end scope when side by side, but there is. Trust me.
Posted by Tiger 79
The Original Tiger 79
Member since Nov 2007
38056 posts
Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

INFIDEL


I would go with the 50mm one instead of the 40mm one for low light conditions
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram