Started By
Message

re: Revisiting an old argument: The designated hitter

Posted on 5/23/10 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21682 posts
Posted on 5/23/10 at 1:36 pm to
My problem with the DH, and most people's problems who don't like it, is that it changes the way the game is managed. There are no double switches in the AL, and pinch hitting has become a lost art for the most part. The manager just sits there and changes a pitcher if he has to and doesn't have to worry about the ramifications to his lineup.

As for the AL vs NL, my biggest problem is that the World Series is supposed to be baseball's showcase event, and the rules are changed halfway through the series, not once, but twice.

I'd rather just get rid of the DH, but more importantly, I think baseball needs to be unified in this rule, especially since interleague play has become a really big part of the schedule.
Posted by GuruGeaux
Lafayette
Member since May 2010
57 posts
Posted on 5/23/10 at 1:45 pm to
God forbid the NL ever adopt the DH. Outside of Medtiger's priority of uniformity, I agree with everything he said about the DH cheapening the strategy of the game. Managers matter more in the NL, and the game doesn't have an artificial arcade feel that I get too often from AL games.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 5/23/10 at 4:34 pm to
A five year old can figure out the double switch. It's not some high strategy. I have no patience for people extolling its virtues.

And given pitcher speacialization these days, no one has a long bench anymore.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram