Started By
Message

re: Billingsley and Kelly Johnson for Chase Utley

Posted on 5/22/10 at 7:37 pm to
Posted by GerryDiNardo
Bringing Back The Magic!
Member since Mar 2004
5562 posts
Posted on 5/22/10 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

What is failed to mention about this trade is the fact that the guy with Utley offered the trade. There ought to be a rule that if the guy getting fleeced offers the trade, it can't be rejected



There is a dynamic here that you're exploiting. You are the only one who knows the two groups of people in the league. The other group is very very inexperienced and you are taking advantage of them regardless of whether the trade was offered to you or not.

You're lucky you got Longoria for Sandoval and Marcum..
This post was edited on 5/22/10 at 7:42 pm
Posted by reddman
Member since Jul 2005
78187 posts
Posted on 5/22/10 at 7:41 pm to
The trade was vetoed?

Sounds shitty to me. Post the rosters of each team. Did the guy need pitching bad?

ETA: And by shitty, I mean it seems like it was vetoed because there was a fleece, and other owners were jealous.

This post was edited on 5/22/10 at 7:43 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278714 posts
Posted on 5/22/10 at 7:48 pm to
what if Kelly Johnson keeps up the pace?

you never know. Its not a trade that should be vetoed, esp if it was proposed to him
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram