Started By
Message
locked post

BP told feds it could handle oil spill 60 times larger

Posted on 5/19/10 at 12:07 pm
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 12:07 pm
BP told feds it could handle oil spill 60 times larger than Deepwater Horizon


Some highlights:

[QUOTE]
In its 2009 exploration plan for the Deepwater Horizon well, BP PLC states that the company could handle a spill involving as much as 12.6 million gallons of oil per day, a number 60 times higher than its current estimate of the [URL="https://www.al.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/"]ongoing Gulf disaster[/URL].

In associated documents filed with the U.S. Minerals Management Service, the company says that it would be able to skim 17.6 million gallons of oil a day from the Gulf in the event of a spill.

As of Tuesday, BP reported recovering 6 million gallons of oily water since the ongoing spill began four weeks ago. BP spokesman Tom Mueller said that only about 10 percent of the skimmed liquid was oil, which would amount to about 600,000 gallons of oil collected thus far.

...

An emergency would activate the company's Oil Spill Response Plan, a 582-page document submitted to federal regulators in 2008 and designed to cover all BP operations in the Gulf of Mexico.

According to the document, the response plan is triggered "in the event the spill cannot be controlled." It also calls for the company to "assemble a team of technical experts to respond to the situation."

The document provides no detailed discussions of how a runaway well would be stopped, nor does it reflect any plan for devices such as an insertion tube, which is now recovering an estimated 84,000 gallons of oil daily, or the failed containment dome.

...

It says dispersants will be able to sink 6,080 to 7,600 barrels per day into the Gulf.

A safety data sheet about the principal dispersant that the company has reported using during the ongoing spill says "no toxicity studies have been conducted on this product," and labels "the potential human hazard: High."


[/QUOTE]
I think it's clear that the only real R&D on these deep water spills is being done right now. Just a little late
Posted by YatTigah
Lakeview, New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2010
517 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 12:12 pm to
I think BP's operations in the U. S. are likely to be in big trouble after this. It's fairly clear that they were just making shite up as they went along and they continue to do so.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57393 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

A safety data sheet about the principal dispersant that the company has reported using during the ongoing spill says "no toxicity studies have been conducted on this product," and labels "the potential human hazard: High."
What a slant. The MSDS for pesticides sprayed on your food say it's a deadly poison. And it is -in large enough dose. But... spread out into minute doses, it's harmless.
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27725 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 1:12 pm to
Just like the City of New Orleans could handle a cat 5 hurricane.
Posted by Nyala
Member since Jun 2007
104 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 2:47 pm to
SPEND money on research or MAKE money drilling for oil? No brainer.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 5/19/10 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

I think it's clear that the only real R&D on these deep water spills is being done right now. Just a little late


I think it's clear somebody didn't read the report correctly. The document states BP has the capacity to respond to a worst-case scenario. It says nothing at all about how well the response will go. Basically it just says, yeah, if the SHTF we'll have people there working on it, and not much more than that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram