Started By
Message

re: Saints already trading Patrick Robinson?

Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by GeauxAggie972
Poterbin Residence
Member since Aug 2009
29454 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:19 pm to
If it is Brown and Robinson, we better get a shite ton more than just Haynesworth. McIntosh would have to be included, as well as even more than that

And why in the hell would we want Campbell? That is just stupid
This post was edited on 4/23/10 at 2:21 pm
Posted by Hullabaloo
LA
Member since Sep 2009
15296 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:21 pm to
Brown and Robinson for Haynesworth Mcintosh and a 4th sounds good to me
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64468 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:21 pm to




and more



What next?
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49519 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:22 pm to
As said in the other thread, it makes no sense to trade the guy when you could have just traded the pick. Plus a 1st rounder is more than what all indications say would take to get him. If our second is not enough, throw in a 4th. They probably won't get more than that from anyone else.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77414 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

And why in the hell would we want Campbell?



Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166497 posts
Posted on 4/23/10 at 2:38 pm to
quote:


And why in the hell would we want Campbell? That is just stupid


Why would we want Campbell? Really? I'm the stupid one?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram