which is easier to cut down, sacks or INT's?

same thread, different title....

JJ vs JL

quote:

---

I can easily see JL committing only 10-12 INT's.

---

you can't see less that that? I can.

quote:

---

I can easily see JL committing only 10-12 INT's.



you can't see less that that? I can.

---

How can either of you see less than that? JL has not shown that he has the decision making capability to make the transition.

don't see why either one couldn't be significantly improved upon... you can argue both are functions of not making the correct read quickly and making the correct decision to throw or ditch

to some extent the sacks are also a function of OL and back blocking... which was a problem last year

Allow me to sum this thread up:

JL supporters say that its easier to cut down on ints

JJ supporters say that its easier to cut down on sacks

quote:

---

That O looked like #120 with JL at the helm vs La Tech.

---

How'd it look while scoring 38 against UGA? 21 against Florida? 30 against Arkansas? 38 against Georgia Tech?

quote:

---

Against the Gumps, we still had a shot 'till JJ got hurt. Enter JL and..... you know the rest of the story.

---

Because it's really easy to come into a game with little to no preparation and perform well against the best defense in the nation. If you expected a QB who wasn't part of the gameplan to come in and succeed in that situation, then you clearly don't know what goes into preparing a team to play each week.

I realize that Lee's pick six's were crippling at times. An OL missing a block, Randle not catching the ball and Loston jumping the route for a pick six in the spring game just brought all the nightmares back in LSU fans' minds.

However, it's an awfully simpleminded fanbase to not see the progression Lee has made in terms of accuracy and reads. That pick six in the spring game is a fluke play. The ones from his first year weren't.

The fact that we were 100+ in ANY offensive category under Jefferson is just embarrassing. That's including the fact that we had WRs who made DBs look like they were blindfolded all year long (where are we against Washington without Toliver's catch and runs? Bama's DBs didn't even look like they knew how to spell "cover" when we actually got the ball to our WRs).

I really don't think people comprehend how staggering that 34 sacks number is. That's unheardof. Brees probably hasn't taken that many sacks in his career at New Orleans. Sacks and three-and-outs are just as crippling to a team as interceptions.

Well said.

sacks