- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

How many games did LSU lose last year where they were favored ?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:22 pm
Florida, Alabama and Ole Miss were all favored by the odds makers to beat LSU. Name the teams where LSU was the favorite and got beat during the regular season.
This post was edited on 3/28/10 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:26 pm to aglandry
So what you're saying is that LSU is the 4th or 5th best team in the SEC
frick
frick
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:27 pm to aglandry
Name the teams that LSU has beaten in the last two years that were ranked in the top 25.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:29 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
So what you're saying is that LSU is the 4th or 5th best team in the SEC
The odds makers are saying it, I'm saying it and the results confirm it.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:30 pm to aglandry
quote:
Florida, Alabama and Ole Miss were all favored by the odds makers to beat LSU. Name the teams where LSU was the favorite and got beat during the regular season.
LSU only beat one "good" team. Much more realistic way of looking at it.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:31 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
So what you're saying is that LSU is the 4th or 5th best team in the SEC
frick
I think that would probably be 3 or 4 which is hat the record played out.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:37 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
So what you're saying is that LSU is the 4th or 5th best team in the SEC
frick
LSU finsihed #3 in the SEC in 2009. Florida Ranked #3 & Bama Ranked #1.
LINK
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:48 pm to notiger1997
quote:
Name the teams that LSU has beaten in the last two years that were ranked in the top 25.
Auburn #10 going into game in '08 and GT in the Chik-fil-a bowl.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 2:58 pm to aglandry
quote:
Florida, Alabama and Ole Miss were all favored by the odds makers to beat LSU.
OK, I'm with you so far.
quote:
Name the teams where LSU was the favorite and got beat during the regular season.
LSU didn't lose any other games during the regular season.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:05 pm to aglandry
quote:
Florida, Alabama and Ole Miss were all favored by the odds makers to beat LSU.
Are you sure about Ole Miss?
quote:
Name the teams where LSU was the favorite and got beat during the regular season.
Why make the distinction between regular season and bowl games? Because the bowl game refutes your attempted point?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:06 pm to aglandry
quote:
How many games did LSU lose last year where they were favored ?
I remember when that question was essentially the same as asking how many games we lost, since we were nearly always favored. Now, we're underdogs a few times a year because we aren't as good any more. And that's supposed to be a good thing?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:07 pm to foshizzle
quote:
LSU didn't lose any other games during the regular season.
That is the point. Why is everyone up in the air when we won the games we were supposed to win and only loss the ones we were expected to lose? The team did exactly what most people expected them to do.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:08 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Auburn #10 going into game in '08 and GT in the Chik-fil-a bowl.
Wow. We're now reduced to thumping our chests over beating a 5-6 (or was Auburn 4-7?) team two years ago. Whoopie!
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:09 pm to aglandry
quote:
Why is everyone up in the air when we won the games we were supposed to win and only loss the ones we were expected to lose?
Because we were only expected to lose those games due to our own ineptitude. You're basically saying it's OK that we suck because everybody knows we suck.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:10 pm to RANDY44
quote:
Auburn #10 going into game in '08 and GT in the Chik-fil-a bowl.
That Auburn win gets a big fat asterisk cause they turned out to be a pretty darn bad 5-7 team that year and Tech was favored over us because of our woeful underachievement that season.
Let's hope the changes we've made bear fruit and we can start a new trend of beating teams that we're underdogs against.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:11 pm to Sammich
quote:
LSU finsihed #3 in the SEC in 2009. Florida Ranked #3 & Bama Ranked #1.
Either we were better than Ole Miss and therefore were supposed to beat them and didn't, or we were worse than Ole Miss and therefore were supposed to lose to them and did. I don't see where either scenario is any better than the other. The better scenario would be the one that used to occur back in the recent past...when we didn't have to have a debate about whether we were better than Ole Miss.
This post was edited on 3/28/10 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:11 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Because we were only expected to lose those games due to our own ineptitude.
That's a huge reach right there. Rantards at their finest.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:11 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Are you sure about Ole Miss?
Yes, Ole Miss was favored because they were playing at home. Oddsmakers favored Ole Miss.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:14 pm to aglandry
quote:
Yes, Ole Miss was favored because they were playing at home. Oddsmakers favored Ole Miss.
So, the oddsmakers knowing we weren't as good as Ole Miss (or, in any event, weren't going to be able to beat them) makes it OK that we couldn't beat Ole Miss?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 3:16 pm to lsutiger_08
quote:
That's a huge reach right there. Rantards at their finest.
No, the huge reach is saying that an 8-4 team that got throttled by Mississippi State is a team that LSU is "supposed" to lose to, so that losing to them is not an indication that we have a problem with our coaching staff.
Popular
Back to top

6




