Started By
Message

re: Zecco

Posted on 3/10/10 at 4:37 pm to
Posted by Feed Me Popeyes
Baltimore, MD
Member since Apr 2008
2104 posts
Posted on 3/10/10 at 4:37 pm to
In the low hundreds per trade, but not the thousands or anything. I don't have firm dollar estimates, but it's safe to say I'm a really small fish for now

This is more of a "getting started" account. I will not trade often and I am only planning to use this for stock trades, not ETF's.





Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 3/10/10 at 4:54 pm to
If you'll be investing in the low 100s/trade, then definitely go with whichever broker offers the cheapest commissions despite how sucky the rest of their services may be. The name of the game for you right now is beating commissions. On a $100 trade via E*Trade, and for someone who is not an active trader, you'd have to make 13% before you even break even. With Zecco, that may be more like 5%. On a $200 trade w/ Zecco, your break even percent gain is 2.5%. This is definitely more manageable than with E*Trade, although it will still be a task. I would recommend putting your entire position on one stock as a way of defeating the strangleholds commissions will be putting on you. With all of your eggs in one basket, you will have to do very good due diligence. Once you get more capital, then you can start branching out w/ other positions. Some people will preach diversity until they're blue in the face ... it has its merits, but not for people with only a few hundred in their accounts. And like Buffett says, "wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.”

Once you get a few thousand, then I'd recommend switching over to E*Trade.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram