- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2-14 SEC squads: Which one was better?
Posted on 3/8/10 at 12:27 pm to TigerRagAndrew
Posted on 3/8/10 at 12:27 pm to TigerRagAndrew
quote:dude I dont think anyone has averaged 40 minutes a game ever considering games are 40 minutes
Nobody averaged 40 minutes a game
That 2001 team had ONE guy who was worth a damn coming off the bench. Had they had any depth whatsoever, they could have been really good
2
Posted on 3/8/10 at 12:29 pm to Pilot Tiger
Had Lamont Roland played, we'd have won at least a handful more games. Hell, even Brad Bridgewater would have helped.
Posted on 3/8/10 at 12:30 pm to Pilot Tiger
quote:
South I was wondering where you were. They were bashing your boy Eddie earlier on a different thread. I was waiting for you to ride in on a white horse to save his arse from all the haters.
I know. I have tried to keep a bit quiet lately... Eating my crow is tough. I thought this team would perform better than they did. I still think Eddie has the potential to be a 7pt 7 reb guy coming off the bench. I like his game a lot. He was a big help when we moved to the zone cause he can still find someone to block out, unlike most in a zone.
On which team was better, I would have to say 2001, but I will say the 2010 team has stayed in games with very good opponents and have certainly gotten better as the year has gone on.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News