Even with the best coaching in the world, not every QB turns out to be a stud, or even knows when to throw the ball away (see Jamarcus Russell). It's tough to guage how much is coaching and how much is smarts and ability. Certainly, Matt Flynn looked well coached under Crowton. I think JJ's development is 50% JJ and 50% Crowton. Can't put this all on coaching.

I question how much better JJ will be, because I do not see that much difference between the beginning of the year and the end of the year.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by CAJUN LSU MAN

NASHVILLE,TN.RAISED IN LAFAYETTE,LA

Member since Jan 2010

378 posts

Posted on 1/13/10 at 6:34 pm to Peachtree Tiger

man you have got to be a moron. in the same thread you said jr wasn't good then you said matt flynn was.you do know that jr was a better qb in every statistical way,right. some of you people must just block out that Flynn shite the bed in games. for gods sake JJ just about put up the same stats Flynn did without a running game. some of you people need to think then post

This post was edited on 1/13/10 at 6:38 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerTatorTots

The Safeshore

Member since Jul 2009

80802 posts

Posted on 1/13/10 at 7:29 pm to Peachtree Tiger

yes

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerBandAlumnus82

Pensacola,FL

Member since Jul 2007

3104 posts

Posted on 1/14/10 at 11:30 am to Peachtree Tiger

He'll be better, but "Better" doesn't mean "Great" or even "Very Good." I see a career Marcus Randall there. I don't see him being good enough to lead us to an S.E.C. or S.E.C. West title and that's the only thing that matters. Maybe Gonzales can do something with him, but that's a big ????, being that he's never played QB or coached QB's before.........

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board