Started By
Message

re: Reveille article pulled?

Posted on 12/4/09 at 1:45 pm to
Posted by ligerbait
Nashville, TN
Member since Dec 2005
3125 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I don't see what the big deal is. McCarthy paid for Hicks to have a crib in BR. Why are some of you so fricking pissed at the Reveille. They are a newspaper. They aren't there to blow smoke up the athletic department's asses.


If you had read the article, it didn't say anything about the APT. It said that Mccarthy paid Hicks cash to come here. Huge difference in the eyes of the NCAA.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

If you had read the article, it didn't say anything about the APT. It said that Mccarthy paid Hicks cash to come here. Huge difference in the eyes of the NCAA.


This.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 1:49 pm to
so maybe McCarthy DID pay Hicks to come to LSU. Do any of you KNOW he did not?
Posted by TigerMom
Member since Nov 2007
414 posts
Posted on 12/5/09 at 12:02 am to
hmmmm
Posted by aglandry
lafayette
Member since Oct 2008
2574 posts
Posted on 1/22/10 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

It said that Mccarthy paid Hicks cash to come h



How do you prove such a statement unless both Hicks and McCarthy confirm that it happened? You end up with a he said, he said situation.If the Reveille or any newspaper doesn't have concrete evidence, they shouldn't print the article.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram