- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Besides the cheating, what really bugs me about the PP call
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:47 am
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:47 am
In a situation where the on-field refs ADMITTEDLY didn't have a clear view of the play, the role of the replay booth should be to get the call CORRECT... i.e., toss out the field judgment, altogher, and make the ruling, itself.
Miles's statement that he was "satisfied" was not only chickenshit but stupid. WHY should he be satisfied with a process that delivered an obviously incorrect ruling?
Miles's statement that he was "satisfied" was not only chickenshit but stupid. WHY should he be satisfied with a process that delivered an obviously incorrect ruling?
11
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:49 am to Rex
The ruling on the field stands... I replied with what fricking ruling?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:50 am to Rex
Wait what are you talking about? Was there a bad call last week or something?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:50 am to Rex
Alabama's strange field design.. 
Posted on 11/14/09 at 9:54 am to Rex
What bothers me is that Patrick doesn't get credit for a phenomenal play. That goes against everything that competition stands for. An outside source is imparting their will on the play and the result which has been shown to be egregiously wrong. That's what bothers me the most.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 12:50 pm to Rex
If the video evidence is inconclusive from the replay booth, the call on the field stands. I personally saw a foot in bounds on film,so to me this means the replay official either did not think that Peterson's foot was in bounds,or He believed the video evidence was inconclusive.
Objectively speaking,this replay guy is full of shite on both issues cause the video was very good and the foot was clearly in bounds.
Objectively speaking,this replay guy is full of shite on both issues cause the video was very good and the foot was clearly in bounds.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 12:58 pm to Rex
Miles is such a company "yes" man are you really shocked?
Sometimes I wish he would put down the act of being a 100% all the time good guy, and just be honest instead of constantly blowing smoke up everybody's arse.
Sometimes I wish he would put down the act of being a 100% all the time good guy, and just be honest instead of constantly blowing smoke up everybody's arse.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:06 pm to Rex
quote:
In a situation where the on-field refs ADMITTEDLY didn't have a clear view of the play, the role of the replay booth should be to get the call CORRECT... i.e., toss out the field judgment, altogher, and make the ruling, itself.
Miles's statement that he was "satisfied" was not only chickenshit but stupid. WHY should he be satisfied with a process that delivered an obviously incorrect ruling?
I think you see a weakness in the replay system. The "clear error" standard works when there is a call with error. It seemed to me listening on the radio while driving that there was no call. The SEC should require the officials to make a call or empower the replay booth to make an original call. Field officials who do not want to make a call should be replaced. Their job is to call it like they see it. Technology can take care of errors.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:06 pm to Rex
quote:
In a situation where the on-field refs ADMITTEDLY didn't have a clear view of the play, the role of the replay booth should be to get the call CORRECT... i.e., toss out the field judgment, altogher, and make the ruling, itself.
I haven't been able to figure out what basis the on field refs had for calling PP out of bounds. If you didn't see the play, why should the default be failure instead of success? In this situation, he never should have been called out of bounds and replay should have been used to overturn that call.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:39 pm to Rex
quote:Would not have mattered, they had a crystal clear view of the spear and never flagged it.
In a situation where the on-field refs ADMITTEDLY didn't have a clear view of the play
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:45 pm to Rex
I bet if it was USC arrests... 
Posted on 11/15/09 at 12:30 pm to Rex
quote:
Miles's statement that he was "satisfied" was not only chickenshit but stupid. WHY should he be satisfied with a process that delivered an obviously incorrect ruling?
If you are making four million dollars a year, and your excutive board of advisors explains the hard facts of life, what would you say to them?
Don't tell me, let me guess; "take this job and shove it".
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News