Started By
Message

re: Dale Murphy, HOF?? Should be!!!!

Posted on 8/3/09 at 8:20 am to
Posted by MStreetTiger
Dallas
Member since Dec 2007
12403 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 8:20 am to
quote:

And Rice, who is in the Hall now, who I believe is inferior to both.


I have to disagree with you here. Just to compare with Murphy, Rice was superior in BA, OBP, SLG (BA and SLG by significant margins.

Rice was in top 5 of MVP voting 6 times (1 win). Murphy in top 5 twice (both wins).

We can argue "comparable" especially when you bring defense into the picture...but "inferior"? I don't think so.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/3/09 at 8:36 am to
Rice was certainly a better slugger than Murphy or Dawson. But he couldn’t play defense at all and was a liability on the basepaths. Also, aside from one great season late in his career, he was effectively done as a top hitter at age 30. Albert Belle is the player people think Jim Rice is, and I don’t see people clamoring to put him in the Hall.

Murphy and Dawson are also centerfielders, and let’s be honest, that’s a different position than the corner OF slot. Offense isn’t quite as important because of the defensive responsibility. Relative to their position, Dawson and Murphy are better hitters.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram