- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
at this point...
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:08 pm
i'm not going to be upset if lache goes somewhere else. We have Michael Ford, i think Ridley will get some time at RB. We seem to have Storm under our control, same with Hilliard and Hill. Don't get me wrong i would love to have the home run threat of Lache in our backfield along with RS running options. But if we don't get him it's not going to kill us. I think missing out on Reed would be much more devastating.
4
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:09 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
stop posting random thoughts that pop into your head.
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:16 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
If we don't get Lache, then Christine Michael was a big fail by the LSU staff. It's as simple as that.
Posted on 7/21/09 at 12:18 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
None of those guys are speed backs though.
Posted on 7/21/09 at 2:16 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
I think he is a great talent, but he will not make or break our program. Auburn needs him much more than we do. I would rather have the three great backs that we could get if we dont get Lache. I know its not for sure, but i just dont think he is gonna be a dominant rb. i think sec defensive ends will cut him off from getting around the edge
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News