Oh please, Sylar is a very, very one dimensional villain. I guarentee the only thing the writers wanted to do was rip off Norman Bates and give him super powers. Sylar is also so stupid that he has to have a super power to know when someone is lying to him. I mean I watched part of season 3 (slowly but surely), and whenever Mrs. Petrelli just tells him he's her son, he just blindly accepts it? How stupid is he? Ben Linus (the actual best villain on TV) would have had a f-ing hay day manipulating someone as stupid as Sylar.

Also have you noticed that the show has absolutely sucked balls ever since they decided to spare Sylar in the ridiculously anti-climatic finale of season 1. I mean you can count the number of good episodes since then on one hand.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Freauxzen

Utah

Member since Feb 2006

37412 posts

Posted on 4/28/09 at 11:05 am to OMLandshark

quote:
Oh please, Sylar is a very, very one dimensional villain.

Agreed, what could have been a great character, they just f-up.

quote:
Ben Linus (the actual best villain on TV) would have had a f-ing hay day manipulating someone as stupid as Sylar.

Ok, you want to talk about one-dimensional villains? The only reason Ben Linus is still alive is because Lost writers have no idea what to do with him so they make other characters mentally handicapped, allowing him to live. The more I think about it, the central problem with Lost is Ben Linus. The show would be better off without him. He served a purpose, now they need to move on.

Season 1 Sawyer would have shot his arse a long time ago. And why didn't Sayid shoot him in the head, he's already killing a kid, might as well make sure.

This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 11:08 am

1 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board