Started By
Message

re: the Spike Lee vs. Clint Eastwood feud

Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:46 pm to
Posted by ndtiger
vicksburg, ms
Member since Aug 2004
8677 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:46 pm to
the Katrina documentary was total crap....and yes I watched it.

Malcolm X was a great film.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112866 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:48 pm to
any reasons why it was crap?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Lee


Trash of a human being.
Posted by TPN - da #1 Stunna
Abita Springs
Member since Nov 2005
736 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:49 pm to
This is not even debatable.

Spike Lee is a overhyped, liberal media backed arse clown. Clint Eastwood will go down as one of the greatest legends in the history of cinema.

Racism only comes into this arguement because it is Spike Lee's calling card in everything he does. It is his lifelong agenda. It permeates the theme of every movie, documentary, and comment he ever makes. He has the range of a daisy air rifle as a director.

Clint Eastwood is an outstanding actor, and equally talented director that has delved into many subjects and genres over the course of his 50+ years in the movie business.

This is a fricking joke - it is blasphamous to even compare the resumes. Clint Eastwood takes shits bigger than Spike Lee's sorry arse career.

I am sick of hearing about racism. We have a black President. That shite is dead. All I keep hearing is we need to address racism, yet every time the subject is brought up, the moment you don't agree with the other point of view, you are called a racist. This is not racism. This is just facts. Do your research. Open your eyes and ears. Open your mind like you ask the other side to do, and you might learn something about the topic at hand and yourself.

Racism, the last ditch effort to even the playing field when you are getting your arse kicked by the facts.

FWIW, the last Indiana Jones film was fricking horrible. I wish that movie was never made. It damn near ruined the other 3 movies. George Lucas while innovative and smart is a money whore who does not know how to quite while he is ahead. He is getting as bad as Sly Stallone in beating a dead horse with a movie idea/franchise (Rocky/Rambo vs Indiana Jones/Star Wars).
This post was edited on 3/21/09 at 7:54 pm
Posted by ndtiger
vicksburg, ms
Member since Aug 2004
8677 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:50 pm to
the thing was slanted to the negative racist BS. Lets let a whole bunch of idiots make outrages statements and then lets do no investigation into said charges.
Posted by ndtiger
vicksburg, ms
Member since Aug 2004
8677 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:51 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112866 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:53 pm to
do you not understand the point of the documentary was to get EVERYONE'S perspective? From the poor, the middle class folks, and the city's elite, he got their perspective of Katrina.

The people who usually hate it, either a.) didn't even see it b.) hate that he took Bush and the feds at the time to task. Even though he also made Nagin and Blanco look like fools.
This post was edited on 3/21/09 at 7:55 pm
Posted by Afreaux
Conway Bayou
Member since Aug 2007
47019 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Racism only comes into this arguement because it is Spike Lee's calling card in everything he does.


Including Sears commercials?

How about She's Gotta Have It, and a whole bunch of other movies that have nothing to do with race?

I stopped reading your hack rant right there, try watching some of his movies before you knock them
Posted by ndtiger
vicksburg, ms
Member since Aug 2004
8677 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

do you not understand the point of the documentary was to get EVERYONE'S perspective?


okay. idiotic on his part...but okay I see
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39747 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:56 pm to
I only mentioned the Indy numbers because someone up thread asked for them.
Posted by Bucky
Las Vegas
Member since Nov 2008
2517 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

I don't see how anybody can think that Spike Lee is anywhere near as talented as Clint Eastwood.
Posted by Afreaux
Conway Bayou
Member since Aug 2007
47019 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Bucky


He kicks Eastwood's arse as a director, end of story.
Posted by TPN - da #1 Stunna
Abita Springs
Member since Nov 2005
736 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:09 pm to
I knew I would have 1 pussy try to trash my factual arguement by finding the 1 item that was not raced based, so here you go, and thank you for taking the bait and proving my point, moron.

First of all, I dont give a frick if you read anything I post. I am not trying to impress your agenda driven racist arse.

I have seen many of his films - She's Gotta Have It, Do the Right Thing, Malcolm X, Mo Betta Blues, Katrina Crap, Jungle Fever, etc.

Tell me that 90% of his work does not deal with racial issues. You probably are not old enough to recall Spike Lee's Nike commercials into question since that does not support me either, but the fact remains that 90=% of his career is based on race and race baiting.

Some idiots think he is a genius because he gets us talking about racial issues. Wrong, he is a racial antagonist. He is a filmmaking Jesse Jackson. Both claim that they want to eliminate racism while they both rely and thrive off of it to make their living. It will never come, but I pray for the day that racism goes away completely, making one trick ponies like the good Reverend, Al Sharpton and Spike Lee obsolete. Without the very thing they preach so vehemently against, they are out of business.

Open your mind, wake up, stop being a sheep, and learn something. Being bitter about something that happened 400 years ago and had nothing to do with you is not positive.
Posted by RGCjr01
Brookhaven / Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Dec 2008
4865 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:09 pm to
I agree the 4th Indiana Jones was awful. I was just wondering what it made worldwide compared to Miracle at St. Anna.

I see on John Turturro's IMDB page that he is in alot of Spike's films. What is the relationship between the two? Turturro as the detective in Miracle at St. Anna is one of the main reasons I ordered it on netflix.
Posted by TPN - da #1 Stunna
Abita Springs
Member since Nov 2005
736 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:12 pm to
I am not sure of their relationship, but you are right that he has been in alot of his movies. Jungle Fever and Do the Right Thing just to name a few.

I hated the last Indiana Jones movie.
Posted by Cameo
The Dirty South
Member since Mar 2009
36 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:23 pm to
Clint Eastwood= John Singleton

All style, no substance to his movies. He produces alot of fluff crap based on his past reputation of Dirty Harry. I didn't like some of Spike's earlier work, but he seemed to turn the corner with Bamboozled. He isn't a race baiter. He touches sensitive issues which really makes caucasians take a look at themselves and finally admit to themselves,
quote:

Damnit i really am a racist
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:58 pm to
you guys are crazy, read most of y'all comments, Spike has had a long time to develop his craft so he should be a good director, his best movies IMO are Macolm X, He Got Game, and Inside Man, but he put out absolute garbage when he started like School Daze. East wood has been making quality movies for awhile now, and as more than one oscar to his credit, so hands down he is the better director.
This post was edited on 3/21/09 at 9:00 pm
Posted by TPN - da #1 Stunna
Abita Springs
Member since Nov 2005
736 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:04 pm to
You are entitled to your opinion, and I respect that, but I disagree with you. What does Dirty Harry have to do with anything. What does it have to do with Unforgiven, Heartbreak Ridge, Pale Rider, Bridges of Madison County, A Perfect World, Midnight In the Garden of Good & Evil, Million Dollar Baby, Mystic River, etc.

You can defend Spike Lee all you want by saying he it thought provoking, but I think most people see right through him and see him as a race baiter. For someone so concerned about the stause of race relations in this country, he throws around the topic like he has ownership of it because he is a black man. He uses his propaganda pieces to ram it down your throat that there is a HUGE problem. While it is a problem, it is not nearly as bad as portrayed in his movies or rhetoric. He has an agenda that he is constantly beating on. The message is - repent white man, you do/did us wrong.

In the grand scheme of things, he is a lightweight in the industry. His films have thier audience, I mean hell, Tyler Perry's films have an audience too, but they are not even a blip on the radar anymore. His racial bullshite message is played out. Everyone already knows what you get when you go see one of his movies. Thus, his audience is not expanding, it is shrinking. You cannot say the same about Clint Eastwood.
Posted by Vood
Enjoying a Forty with Lando
Member since Dec 2007
8352 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

He kicks Eastwood's arse as a director, end of story.


I didnt know today was Aprils fools day yet.

Last I checked the Academy awards for the bench mark for any actor or director. Clint has 5 wins(none for best actor) for 11 nominations while Spike has is 0 for 2. The Academy is one of the most Liberal organizations out there. This years winner for best picture should remove any doubts if you dont believe me.

This post was edited on 3/21/09 at 9:11 pm
Posted by TPN - da #1 Stunna
Abita Springs
Member since Nov 2005
736 posts
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:09 pm to
Don't let facts get in the way of the agenda.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram