- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: sec basketball champs question
Posted on 2/23/09 at 9:21 am to tigerinridgeland
Posted on 2/23/09 at 9:21 am to tigerinridgeland
quote:
Is it up to the conference to determine the automatic bid? My understanding was that the conference could designate the regular season champion or the tournament champion as the automatic qualifier. All conferences designate the tournament winner, in part because it increases the chances of at least 2 teams getting bids. But if the field were limited to one team per conference, you might find that conferences would then tend to send the regular season champion.
In my view, both in baseball and basketball, the regular season championship is the more significant recognition since it represents a season's work, not just a hot 4 game streak.
Yes it is up to the conferences. The NCAA doesn't care how you select your champion. Historically, conferences have given the tournament champion the bid in order to give the tournament some meaning. Back in the day S. Carolina was in the ACC and had some great basketball teams that didn't go to the NCAA (only 8 spots available at the time) because they couldn't win the tournament. I'm pretty sure most of the other conf tournaments didn't get added until after the NCAA expanded.
I agree the regular season is more important, but it is the price you pay if you want a profitable postseason tournament. In 2001 football, you can say TN was the regular season football champ and LSU was the CG champ, but we don't (even though TN played and beat LSU during the season). LSU is considered the SEC champ that year.
Posted on 2/23/09 at 9:28 am to Indiana Tiger
quote:
Yes it is up to the conferences. The NCAA doesn't care how you select your champion. Historically, conferences have given the tournament champion the bid in order to give the tournament some meaning. Back in the day S. Carolina was in the ACC and had some great basketball teams that didn't go to the NCAA (only 8 spots available at the time) because they couldn't win the tournament. I'm pretty sure most of the other conf tournaments didn't get added until after the NCAA expanded.
The ACC and Big 8 (Big 12's predecessor,of course)pretty much always had a tournament. The SEC had won until 1952 and then mothballed it until 1979. The Pac 10 had won for a while in the 80's,dropped it and brought it back. The Big 10 finally put one in over Bob Knight's protests in the late 1990's. The Big East had had one since its inception in the early 1980's.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News