Started By
Message
locked post

My Take On The DIY Debate

Posted on 2/16/09 at 5:05 pm
Posted by amsterdam
In His Word
Member since Jul 2008
1033 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 5:05 pm
Since wampa put the debate full front and center Id like to officially throw in my take on the idea. I think wampa brings up some good points that I had overlooked. But, although a few of you think his my alter, trust me when I say we do not agree on everything.

First thing, I do think it is possible to manage your investments on your own and be successful at it. After all anything is possible. In my opinion in order accomplish this feat, you must be willing to dedicate a sizable portion of everyday to your portfolio and the news that is relevant to it. I have known some DIYers to spend between 3-6 hrs a day on this. Probably about right.

If your are not willing to put in the neccesary time, if you already have a full time job, family, and other major time constraints then do yourself a favor and entrust your money to a financial advisor who does this everyday. You will be better for it then trying to do it half arse on your own. More on my recommendations about FA's later.

If you are doing the neccessary legwork on your portfolio, and have found competent sources for your financial information(tigerdroppings isnt one of them) then you may be able to do this successfully without the aid of an advisor. Just do not get so arrogant that you think you can predict the market.

I want everyone here to admit something. You are investing to hopefully make yourself wealthy one day. If your doing it on your own, you are probably starting with a modest amount of money. Say 10,000. The stakes are lower and who wants to pay fees on the little youve been able to save so far, right?

Well lets say you are successful at this, and your nest egg grows to 100k or even a million. I would argue that now your stakes are somewhat higher.

Now throw in an inevitable market correction of say 20%. On your 10k you would lose 2k. That stings, but you can recover from that. Now figure your million loses 200k in the same downturn...That would ruin anyones day. May even cause a few of us to get emotional...who knows maybe even cause you to make poor decisions on your portfolio based on fear instead of fact.

Heres my point. If you are successful enough at the do it yourself game, then eventually it becomes prudent for you to "hire" an advisor to help you manage it.

Manage what? That depends on you. Some want to create trusts and living wills, others want to sheild themselves from taxes, some still want garuantees on their money. The list of wants and needs can be long, and even the most savvy stock guru can need help in other areas.

Who should I "hire"? From what I gather on this site 99% of you thinks that the people in my profession are either dishonest or incompetent, or both. I can only assure you that that assertion is completely untrue. But for the wary investor there is a way to protect yourself. In my opinion there are two classes of advisors. The ones that are Certified Financial Planners(CFP) and the ones who are not. That simple. Its like the difference between a bookkeeper and a CPA.

If I were in your shoes, when looking for an advisor I would insist on a few things:

1. That the advisor brings something to the table. I have clients who are very hands off, and other who are very hands on.

2. That you tell the advisor in no uncertain langauge what your expectations are.

3. That you expect the advisor to earn his fee. No free lunch. If they dont add value, then find someone who will.

4. That your advisor is a CFP, or at the very least is in the process of obtaining one. It takes about a year and a half of intense studying to be able to sit for the test, and well over 50% still flunk it. It is a true litmus test of quality and knowledge.

You can only gain with a competent advisor on your "staff". I know personally when it comes to difficult questions I employ as many as a dozen experts, analysts, and home office personnel to consult with. I am OCD about getting it right. Sometimes with this, you dont get a second chance.

You eventually will come across an issue that you need help with. It could be setting up a 72t on your IRA. Getting some info on the possibility of a bond of yours might fail. A better explanation of a Variable Annuity and its benefits, or the ability to watch out for terrible investments like an index annuity. It might be something as simple as a second opinion on a stock idea.

Knowing the resources I have available, and the lack thereof in comparison for the DIYer, I shudder at the thought of any of you doing it 100% start to finish on your own.

This is one of those things where the more you know, the more you realize how little you know.

No General goes to war alone, but instead surrounds himself with an army
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 5:10 pm to
quote:


First thing, I do think it is possible to manage your investments on your own and be successful at it. After all anything is possible. In my opinion in order accomplish this feat, you must be willing to dedicate a sizable portion of everyday to your portfolio and the news that is relevant to it. I have known some DIYers to spend between 3-6 hrs a day on this. Probably about right.

I thought your strategy was buy and hold. And you can't time the market. Why the frick would I need to spend this much time if I am always buying in, and holding the asset? i.e. not trying to time the market.

Makes no sense to me.

BTW, I easily spend 15 hrs a week on finance related matters.
Posted by Parliament
Member since Dec 2007
5787 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

...competent sources for your financial information(tigerdroppings isnt one of them)...


frick

YOU

quote:


Now throw in an inevitable market correction of say 20%. On your 10k you would lose 2k. That stings, but you can recover from that. Now figure your million loses 200k in the same downturn...That would ruin anyones day. May even cause a few of us to get emotional...who knows maybe even cause you to make poor decisions on your portfolio based on fear instead of fact.


Why? It's the same percentage in either case.

quote:

From what I gather on this site 99% of you thinks that the people in my profession are either dishonest or incompetent, or both.


And, the good ones only give a shite about investors with >$1M.
Posted by NOMT
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2007
575 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

If you are doing the neccessary legwork on your portfolio, and have found competent sources for your financial information(tigerdroppings isnt one of them)


I would counter that I have learned more about investing from the contributions of posters like Col Hap and Jersey than from all the books/websites I have ever read, which are substantial in number.

Why? Because I now realize how important it is to think outside the box, and how important it is to question WHY instead of accepting the dogma spouted by the financial world at face value.

I have no problem with using a CFP in general. In fact, I have one, and will continue to use him for now. He has been invaluable in taking some of the retirement planning load off of me since my schedule is so busy.

However, being a good CFP means little to nothing when the topic turns to investing. If anything, I'd say from my discussions with several have led me to the conclusion that everyone read from the same "mutual funds good" / "it's a good time to buy because stocks are cheap" textbook.

It's not meant as an insult...your expertise is in financial planning, not investing. But don't try to sell yourself as something you aren't. That's a disservice to your clients.

JMO.
Posted by Tigris
Mexican Home
Member since Jul 2005
12374 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

competent sources for your financial information(tigerdroppings isnt one of them)


Money Talk does a good job of distilling a lot of information from a variety of sources and has several people that are very knowledgeable. It should not be THE source but it is a good one. Without this board I would have stayed in the market longer than I did this summer. Jersey tipped us off to a mutual bond fund that is now up almost 50% in a few months. The financial planner I used to have wasn't bad in his picks but spent zero time on my account after pocketing his load. If I had been with someone like you for the last 10 years I would have much less for retirement than I do now. Financial planners have arrogance in spades. None that I have known have ever impressed me with actually working diligently and competently for their clients best interests.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 8:14 pm to
amsterdam, plenty you've said here I either agree and disagree with, but it's bedtime here on the east coast so I need to put this off for tomorrow.

My main thrust though is that you seem to be talking mostly about asset allocation decisions. I've been talking about what happens after that, namely, given that a client should have x percent invested in AAA equivalent bonds (determining x being your focus), what is the best way to do this (my focus).

Posted by Rivers
Florida
Member since Nov 2008
3256 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 9:56 pm to
Go ahead, send me to GITMO...send me to a secret prison in Poland in one of those black aircraft that only fly at night...send me to Afganistan and lock me in a shipping containter in 120 degree heat.

No matter the torture, I will still refuse to pay for professional help to screw up something that I am perfectly capable of screwing up myself.
Posted by Edge
nola
Member since Aug 2004
349 posts
Posted on 2/16/09 at 11:49 pm to
Ams, it is tough sledding these days for Financial Advisors. Most FAs didn’t see the market drop coming and clients watched their savings evaporate. But of course, the FAs still collected their management fees in most cases.

Perhaps, your firms need to enhance the value proposition (fees, services, products, etc.)to recover some lost credibility.
Posted by dawgorama
Member since Jun 2004
14690 posts
Posted on 2/17/09 at 10:30 am to
quote:

After all anything is possible. In my opinion in order accomplish this feat, you must be willing to dedicate a sizable portion of everyday to your portfolio and the news that is relevant to it. I have known some DIYers to spend between 3-6 hrs a day on this. Probably about right


A broker won't even spend 3-6 seconds dealing with my portfolio on a daily basis.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 2/17/09 at 9:01 pm to
OK, sorry for the delay. Lots to do and all that.

quote:

I do think it is possible to manage your investments on your own and be successful at it. After all anything is possible. In my opinion in order accomplish this feat, you must be willing to dedicate a sizable portion of everyday to your portfolio and the news that is relevant to it.


I think it depends on what your goal is. Here's the thing - the value of information in a highly liquid market is very very low. Unless one has a really big portfolio it isn't worth the time even if you *do* get it right. Say I hypothetically would get 1% extra performance by working 4 hours/day. If you assume 250 trading days per year that's 1000 hours. If you have a $1 million portfolio, then that extra 1% only got you ten grand, for $10/hour. If you make the kind of money that got you to a million, ten bucks an hour isn't that great a return. Similar arguments apply to lesser portfolios.

quote:

then do yourself a favor and entrust your money to a financial advisor who does this everyday.


Well, since I've already argued that it isn't worth the trouble for the average investor, now let's consider an alternative. Do your own asset allocation (it doesn't take that long), buy indexes to meet the allocation, and forget about it.

This assume one knows how to do proper allocation to begin with. For someone who has no clue, I agree that consulting an advisor is probably a good idea.

quote:

If you are doing the neccessary legwork on your portfolio, and have found competent sources for your financial information(tigerdroppings isnt one of them) then you may be able to do this successfully without the aid of an advisor. Just do not get so arrogant that you think you can predict the market.


Yup. Index funds, anyone?

quote:

even the most savvy stock guru can need help in other areas.


Yes again - I'm only talking about managing a portfolio of assets in the financial markets. Insurance, trusts, etc. are a whole different ball game.

Good points about the difference between a CFP and a CFA. I just think that actively managed funds are almost always an inferior choice. Not a terrible one, but not all that good either. The simple fact remains that actively managed funds, chosen in advance, are routinely outperformed by whatever their index benchmarks happen to be.

So *my* advice to the individual would be to get help on all the other stuff, but stick with index funds and ETF's where possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram