- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:09 am to Cuz413
quote:
Is the runner no longer required to run in the lane?
He was definitely obstructing early down the line. He knew what he was doing. The problem is, by the time Milazzo makes the throw the runner had veered back to the line so on reply it looks like a clean play.
Also you’re not getting that call in Tuscaloosa after that bad of a throw. If there was a collision at first that caused a missed ball you may have a shot.
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:51 am to Cuz413
Didn’t they call interference in Omaha for someone running with 1 foot on the field side of the line? I
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News