Started By
Message

re: Cancellation of Mid-Barataria Diversion project could cost Louisiana at least $700 million

Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:30 am to
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7541 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:30 am to
The Advocate went a little further on this. Some of the money that the contractor could be owed could be nullified by the fact that the contractor did not apply for the necessary parish permits. But a tit for tat like this only enriches the attorneys representing the state and companies.

The project just needs to be built it is probably one of only ways to naturally move water into the basin.


One idea that was floated in the 1990’s was a conveyance channel that started east of Donaldsonville and roughly paralleled Bayou Lafourche to Valentine where it would split in two where one channel would go to Barataria and the other would go into the Terrebonne basin. The big issue with that one is construction costs to dredge a channel.


One parallel idea I thought of recently would be to build a channel to Lake Des Allemands and add fresh water and sediment from there and create a flow into the basin. It shouldn’t impact oyster fishermen as much unless there are oyster leases that far up the basin. It would be a much larger scale Davis Pond, and levees would need to be constructed along the rim of the lake and Bayou and near places like Chackbay and Pleasure Bend.

On the other hand, anytime it rains a lot the Barataria Bay can get so fresh that the water is fresh enough to drink even as far south as Grand Isle.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26639 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Some of the money that the contractor could be owed could be nullified by the fact that the contractor did not apply for the necessary parish permits

They didn't apply for Parish permits because the State told them that they didn't have to. DNR, CPRA, USACE, other federal agencies all signed off on the diversion, which is on State, not Parish land in any case. The whole permit/NFIP thing is just a pretext that Landry, Dove, et al, are trying to now use as an excuse to save themselves from getting the blame for shutting the project down. The State will look moronic if they take that line when the contractor sues over it.

This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 9:49 am
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57472 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 11:09 am to
quote:

could be nullified by the fact that the contractor did not apply for the necessary parish permits.
it was a made up permit......... you know the cost of that permit..... it was like 2% of the project cost....

So the parish wanted 46 million dollars. just to build in their parish....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram