- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Opponents to ask for rehearing in St. George matter
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The NAACP telegraphed their lawsuit a few days ago.
Once LASC denies this rehearing, I expect the NAACP one to be filed in federal court immediately thereafter.
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 7:34 am
4
Posted on 5/1/24 at 7:38 am to Bard
quote:
Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
Those sorts of reasonings. I imagine they'll try to file for a TRO and halt everything for a few months prior to that trial.
There is also the litigation that will occur about the annexed property post-election. They ma
I'm not saying these suits will win, but they can delay things for 5-10 years.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 8:03 am to Bard
quote:
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
Challenge to the City is arguably barred.
NAACP's gripe is about the potential new school district and they will likely find a receptive audience in federal court for the because God forbid a federal court not stick its fricking nose into local education issues.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 9:00 am to Bard
quote:
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter?
Two Words: “Disparate Impact”
And you keep forgetting that written law is meaningless in a common law system if judges decide otherwise. LA can say “ “But this is a state matter!” and THEY can say “You’re violating black civil rights, federal law has precedence “.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:56 pm to Bard
quote:
On what grounds do you think they'll be asking the feds to overturn a State SC on a purely State matter? Disparate impact? Backdoor red-lining attempt?
White privilege
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News