- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:22 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:22 am to Indefatigable
I'm still trying to figure out what this
Was supposed to mean.
The Supreme Court isn't removing Presidents or ending their presidency
quote:
I agree the legislative branch has the ability to end a presidency.
The judicial branch isn’t supposed to have that authority.
Was supposed to mean.
The Supreme Court isn't removing Presidents or ending their presidency
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News