Started By
Message

re: Women Outraged Over Caitlin Clark's Base Contract vs NBA Men

Posted on 4/17/24 at 2:16 pm to
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
4901 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

I am always floored by the number of Americans (here, women) who cannot grasp that for a business (here, a basketball team), the expenditures (here, the salaries) cannot .the revenues of the business.

Clark is a great female basketball player. No one contends otherwise. But if her presence only puts butts in the seats equal to (for example) $80k per year, the business CANNOT pay her (for example) $2mm per year. Bankrupt before the end of the season.

it's the end result of decades worth of Marxist propaganda and brainwashing. people genuinely do not understand the basic concepts of why the WNBA actually loses money while the NBA makes millions and millions. they are so brainwashed with the oppressor / oppressed dialectic that the only logical explanation to them is that men are deliberately shortchanging women for their labor, and there is no consideration given to the fact that their labor has essentially no monetary value.
This post was edited on 4/17/24 at 2:18 pm
Posted by The1TrueTiger
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Member since Apr 2009
1994 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 2:29 pm to
The WNBA is projected to bring in a 200 million profit this year, the NBA is bringing in 10 billion. The NBA have been sustaining the WNBA for years at around 15 million per year to keep the league afloat. How can anyone expect the salaries to be equal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram