Started By
Message

re: The Judge Order just elected Trump.

Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:07 pm to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5683 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Maybe the online course lawyers on here can explain why it is a requirement for a defendant to be in court for this when he has lawyers to represent him.


There is zero requirement that trump be present
Posted by OzonaOkapi
Patrolling the Edwards Plateau
Member since Apr 2024
400 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

There is zero requirement that trump be present
Please explain your reasoning, in light of the following:
quote:

Section 340.50 - Defendant's presence at trial

1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must be personally present during the trial.

2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial. Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to conduct his defense.

3. A defendant who conducts himself in so disorderly and disruptive a manner that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom may be removed from the courtroom if, after he has been warned by the court that he will be removed if he continues such conduct, he continues to engage in such conduct.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram