Started By
Message

re: McNeese 0 @ LSU 16 Final

Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:57 pm to
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78085 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 1:57 pm to
Is pearson offensive? He has somehow avoided flack despite being a veteran who hasnt improved at all. He is barely playable offensive. Cant believe he hasnt removed some of the swing and miss from his game
Posted by BayTiger13
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2022
2113 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 2:23 pm to
People love to say that Kling and Neal are pull only hitters and can't hit yet I would say that Pearson is worse than both when it comes to pulling the ball. Difference is Kling and Neal were big time recruits and Pearson was not as big of an MLB draft threat.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
5073 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Is pearson offensive? He has somehow avoided flack despite being a veteran who hasnt improved at all.


Not from me. At this point, Pearson might be the only name we could see in the lineup that I don't understand in any way. While Neal isn't playing well, I understand he's a left-handed bat with potential. Braswell looks bad in the field, but he's our best bat in SEC play. Kling has struggled a lot but is great in CF. Pearson isn't an offensive play or defensive play and I think he's max'd his potential. He's hitting roughly .230 for the season and in SEC games. Even Kling has similar or better offensive numbers than Pearson in almost every category except HRs.
Posted by Mats86
Member since Mar 2021
3729 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 2:36 pm to
That’s a good question tbh. Trading him and Larson could be an option, since Larson has been better lately
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram