Started By
Message

re: "Conservatives" agree to new entitlement program costing hundreds of millions per year

Posted on 4/9/24 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50447 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

He isn't wrong. The public model does bring in money per student.


Correct but there is an incentive to educate the students. It’s why state testing exists. “Accountability”
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262334 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:



Correct but there is an incentive to educate the students


Not really, and public unions constantly fight against any merit based changes.

There is incentive to move kids through grades, not educate them
This post was edited on 4/9/24 at 1:40 pm
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25950 posts
Posted on 4/9/24 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
He isn't wrong. The public model does bring in money per student.


Correct but there is an incentive to educate the students. It’s why state testing exists. “Accountability”


Yeah. But then you can just accuse the faculty of "teaching the test".

The goal in public education is graduation. Even for the 5% of students expelled.

The goal in private school education is college. But it sure is a lot easier to reach for that goal when you eliminate 100% of the student body who is only interested in graduating.
And eliminate the student body incapable of graduating because of mental handicaps. Those handicap students affect graduation rates for public schools. They don't seem to have any effect on private schools for some reason.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram