Started By
Message

re: Active Marines - Have Women in the Infantry Had a Negative Impact on the USMC?

Posted on 3/28/24 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by crimsonuatide
Member since Jul 2017
1675 posts
Posted on 3/28/24 at 4:36 pm to
I worked with an ex-marine that was active when the laws changed. He said it was a big downturn. Not only did the physical standards lower to let women in, but they where the same for men.

Whome would you rather be your battle buddy? Higher standards or lower? Who do you trust to carry your injured body off the battlefield?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80780 posts
Posted on 3/28/24 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Not only did the physical standards lower to let women in, but they where the same for men.


That sounds like the Army Combat Fitness Test.

Having a minimum 2-mile run standard of 21:04...for 17-21 year old MALES is a disgrace.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73196 posts
Posted on 3/28/24 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

I worked with an ex-marine that was active when the laws changed. He said it was a big downturn. Not only did the physical standards lower to let women in, but they where the same for men.


What is it about completely making shite up that makes some people happy?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram