Started By
Message

re: Let's Find Out How Smart You Baws Are

Posted on 3/24/24 at 10:08 am to
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17086 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

That makes no fricking sense


See the simulation the guy posted above. Go run it 100 times and you will see that keeping your original choice loses about 67% of the time.

For instance, I just ran it 100 times and ended up losing 63% of the time if I kept my original selection. The more times you run it, the closer it will get to the 33/67 probability. This is a basic fact of statistics - the more data you have, the more the trends show up in the data.

Seeing a simulation is what convinced Princeton mathematician Paul Erdos. He was also skeptical until he saw a guy run it on a computer.

This post was edited on 3/24/24 at 10:12 am
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
39040 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

For instance, I just ran it 100 times and ended up losing 63% of the time if I kept my original selection. The more times you run it, the closer it will get to the 33/67 probability. This is a basic fact of statistics - the more data you have, the more the trends show up in the data.


Yeah that’s the law of large numbers . There’s no escaping it.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1085 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

See the simulation the guy posted above. Go run it 100 times and you will see that keeping your original choice loses about 67% of the time.
I understand the Monty Hall problem. I was responding to the dude that said both of the remaining shells would have 2/3 probability of being right. Which is obviously illogical.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram