- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:35 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:35 pm to lsupride87
I still think the prosecution has the betting edge in conviction, but it's gotten a lot closer to a coin flip.
The day after I'd have guessed something like 85-90% shot.
Now it's like 55-45.
Hindsight is 20-20, but they should have given immunity immediately to Carver. Instead they doubled down and charged him with video voyeurism months after, eliminating any latitude they had relating to his alleged criminal conduct.
Politically, it's going to be really difficult to give the white kid immunity after he was charged with the one thing they can prove almost 100%, months after the initial indictments.
The day after I'd have guessed something like 85-90% shot.
Now it's like 55-45.
Hindsight is 20-20, but they should have given immunity immediately to Carver. Instead they doubled down and charged him with video voyeurism months after, eliminating any latitude they had relating to his alleged criminal conduct.
Politically, it's going to be really difficult to give the white kid immunity after he was charged with the one thing they can prove almost 100%, months after the initial indictments.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
They grossly overcharged Carver with charges that have 0% chance of sticking.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 3:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Instead they doubled down and charged him with video voyeurism months after, eliminating any latitude they had relating to his alleged criminal conduct.
So if there is video of her having sex with them (the charge of voyeurism says that) and also shown to be massively inebriated then how could she consent?
This post was edited on 3/12/24 at 3:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News