Started By
Message

re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries

Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96187 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:32 pm to
The prosecution doesn’t have significant DNA from the suspects. If the defense can bring in evidence the vaginal/or anal injuries are linked elsewhere it’s extremely relevant.

People are far too emotionally wrapped up here
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424517 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:35 pm to
I still think the prosecution has the betting edge in conviction, but it's gotten a lot closer to a coin flip.

The day after I'd have guessed something like 85-90% shot.

Now it's like 55-45.

Hindsight is 20-20, but they should have given immunity immediately to Carver. Instead they doubled down and charged him with video voyeurism months after, eliminating any latitude they had relating to his alleged criminal conduct.

Politically, it's going to be really difficult to give the white kid immunity after he was charged with the one thing they can prove almost 100%, months after the initial indictments.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram