Started By
Message

re: SpaceX Starship Flight Test 3 | B10 crashes in Gulf, S28 burns up during reentry

Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by A12 Oxcart
On the float out in the Belt
Member since Dec 2022
321 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Man this don't make no goddamn sense. Before SpaceX no one had ever recovered a rocket before so getting back any pieces, much less intact ones, was never even considered.

Umm, so the shuttle's SRBs don't count?? They parachuted into the ocean and were recovered. Some were refurbished and used again.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Umm, so the shuttle's SRBs don't count?? They parachuted into the ocean and were recovered. Some were refurbished and used again.


Did you not understand the point of my post? Did the SRB ever fly before being strapped onto a manned Shuttle?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Did the SRB ever fly before being strapped onto a manned Shuttle?


It didn't fly, but they did full scale ground testing of the SRB's about 1 hour from my house.

This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 4:57 pm
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57770 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

But that doesn't invalidate the my observation that the SpaceX's success rate, based upon vehicles surviving launch and reentry, isn't great right now.


Thank you for identifying yourself as someone who has no idea what they're talking about in this matter.

Space vehicles are about small incremental progress and several launches and test fires before the final product. Even after they start launching these with humans in them, they're still going to be drastically improving them.

SpaceX is building the biggest missile in human history and trying to control it and make it reusable. So far they've made steady progress with every launch.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

didn't fly, but they did full scale ground testing of the SRB's about 1 hour from my house


And yet it still killed an entire crew of astronauts.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Thank you for identifying yourself as someone who has no idea what they're talking about in this matter.

Space vehicles are about small incremental progress and several launches and test fires before the final product. Even after they start launching these with humans in them, they're still going to be drastically improving them.

SpaceX is building the biggest missile in human history and trying to control it and make it reusable. So far they've made steady progress with every launch.


And you do? My simple point here is, you can do what SpaceX is doing without blowing up rockets on pretty much every test. (And that's the end of my point.)

Real quotes from both Nasa and Elon Musk...

Gene Kranz


Elon Musk
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 5:13 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

And yet it still killed an entire crew of astronauts.



How would SpaceX be fairing right now with astronauts on these rockets?


And the SRB's failed because the were launched under conditions that were outside of their specified tolerances. There were folks that knew and tried to warn the decisions makers but those warnings were ignored. It was not an equipment failure, it was a command and control failure.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 5:17 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:14 pm to
quote:


How would SpaceX be fairing right now with astronauts on these rockets


You clearly don't follow space flight or space news at all.

Read up on spacex, their design philosophy and what they've done and then come back.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

My simple point here is, you can do what SpaceX is doing without blowing up rockets on pretty much every test. (And that's the end of my point.)


It's a really stupid fricking point.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

It's a really stupid fricking point.


In other words, you don't have a retort to it.

Look, I get Elon's risk taking philosophy with SpaceX. He's able to do it because technology is to the point where they can automate the rocket flight controls.

But when you start putting lives at risk, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

But it's his money and he can spend it however he likes.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 5:19 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

But when you start putting lives at risk, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny


That's why they're not putting lives at risk.

Are you familiar with the Falcon 9?
Posted by MemphisGuy
Member since Nov 2023
3457 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

But when you start putting lives at risk, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny.



How many lives has Elon put at risk?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

That's why they're not putting lives at risk.

Are you familiar with the Falcon 9?


Yes. But my point still holds. What were talking about here is a fundamental culture shift in the way NASA did things vs how Musk is doing things with SpaceX. Nasa didn't have the luxury of automated flight plans, gobs digital data downloads and video uplinks. Their stuff had to work right the first time or astronauts would die. so they overengineered everything and had contingency after contingency in place. And that worked really well until Apollo 1. Apollo 1 made them double down on the process until Challenger. But as I said, Challenger wasn't really an equipment failure it was a command and control failure.

I think my perspective comes because I was alive before men walked on the moon. I've seen what our space program can do. As I said, SpaceX's achievements are amazing and beyond what many countries can do. But I can say that and still disagree with the philosophy of how they are testing their vehicles.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

How many lives has Elon put at risk?


I dunno. How many people live downrange of his launches???
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
313 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Real quotes from both Nasa and Elon Musk...

Gene Kranz


You do understand that Kranz said that right after NASA had the mother of all failures in orbit, right?

You don't know your space program history well. We blew up a LOT of rockets before Saturn, and lost two more shuttles after that, along with numerous smaller launches. For every one we lost, the Soviets lost 10.

Falcon 9 had a gestation period that was arguably even worse than Starship. Now it is one of the most reliable platforms available. The Japanese blew up one of theirs 5 seconds off the pad just last week due to a guidance failure. Space be hard. Elon's head is harder, and I thank him for it.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 5:31 pm
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57770 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:31 pm to
You can't be serious comparing a quote from a flight director about the Apollo 13 mission to Musk's quote, which is clearly about testing rockets
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

You can't be serious comparing a quote from a flight director about the Apollo 13 mission to Musk's quote, which is clearly about testing rockets


Did Musk say it or not?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24047 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

You don't know your space program history well.


You're talking to someone who's spent time in Nasa headquarters in the past year and has his own "Try SCE to Aux" t-shirt....
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40092 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

SpaceX just needs to view the data


SpaceX just needs to move 30 miles down the coast into Mexico where reviews will be much quicker
Posted by blight
central
Member since Jul 2012
1010 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

But when you start putting lives at risk, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny.


this argument makes no sense in regards to starship.

how has the last 3 test flights (they’re called integrated test flights for a reason) have put any lives at risk?

Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram