- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/12/24 at 3:17 am to TigerLifer18
You didn’t ask me this question, but my take on it is that he would not have been a good president. IMHO, he was without principled conviction. If you would’ve told him he would have a better chance to gain power as a Democrat, he would have thought nothing of putting the D behind his name.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 7:14 am to TigerLifer18
quote:
Would Jindal have been a good President in your opinion?
Jindal’s skillset is as a technocrat figuring stuff out and designing policy. He’s not a people person and he has no natural charisma. He would have been great as a national department head or assistant to the secretary, in the class of top level people who actually do stuff.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News