Started By
Message

re: Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson - 7/20/24

Posted on 3/7/24 at 10:13 am to
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15371 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 10:13 am to
I feel like this is so disrespectful to Mike's legacy. He is a couple years away from 60. Of course there's a very good chance that he loses this fight. But if he was 20 years younger, it wouldn't even be a fair fight.

This would be like if Michael Jordan agreed to play some random G-league player 1-on-1. It's just stupid.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40859 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I feel like this is so disrespectful to Mike's legacy. He is a couple years away from 60. Of course there's a very good chance that he loses this fight. But if he was 20 years younger, it wouldn't even be a fair fight.



You mean Tyson's legacy of being a wife abuser, rapist, ear eater, and all around insane behavior and actions since Cus D'amato died. Tyson frick up any boxing legacy after that. He's been a joke ever since Buster Douglas put him on his arse.

Now I will give him credit, he has restored his reputation in the last decade, but don't act like his boxing career is beyond reproach.


quote:

This would be like if Michael Jordan agreed to play some random G-league player 1-on-1. It's just stupid.


Comparing Michael Jordan to Mike Tyson professionally is apples to oranges.
Posted by KingofthePoint
Member since Feb 2009
10150 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Of course there's a very good chance that he loses this fight. But if he was 20 years younger, it wouldn't even be a fair fight.

It’s still not a fair fight. Tyson would kill him if he wanted.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram