Started By
Message

re: JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER: "...there is No Climate Emergency"

Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:52 am to
Posted by SaintTiger1
Member since Dec 2019
78 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:52 am to
They also might need to write a paper about it and have it peer reviewed.

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.

LINK /



125 Nobel laureates LINK

101 Nobel laureates LINK

76 Nobel laureates LINK


I guess all it would take is 1 climate scientist to tell you how eating horse deworming cream for Covid is stupid and you would finally believe them.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27352 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

peer reviewed.


It is cute you thinks this means anything in this day and time...
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23374 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:18 am to
quote:

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.


The field was created for the scam and filled with only cult followers of the scam.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124610 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:40 am to
quote:

SaintTiger1
We at a climatary interstadial maximum. What is the cause of the stadial periods? Put another way, what will initiate the next impending stadial?

Your "125 Nobel laureates" seem not to know. Perhaps you could grace us with your 'educated' opinion?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53038 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

They also might need to write a paper about it and have it peer reviewed.

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.


Do i need to be a nobel laureate to understand how funding for science works? Do you think these laureates are getting grants FROM THE GOVERNMENT, by opposing the government favored narrative?

Also, simple composition of our atmosphere would suggest that basing Earth's "warming" solely on CO2 and Methane is idiotic at best.
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 12:28 pm
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2833 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

But of course y'all would believe the one quack


A 2022 Physics Nobel Prize Winner is a "quack" because he disagrees with your man-made global warming cult.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69279 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

They also might need to write a paper about it and have it peer reviewed.

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.

LINK /



125 Nobel laureates LINK

101 Nobel laureates LINK

76 Nobel laureates LINK


I guess all it would take is 1 climate scientist to tell you how eating horse deworming cream for Covid is stupid and you would finally believe them.





Lol, peer-reviewed.


Im going to get a big grant from the government, you are too. Why would we not say the shite we each are saying is right and not bogus? We need never ending funding.

Its our career.





Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99721 posts
Posted on 3/4/24 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

They also might need to write a paper about it and have it peer reviewed.

But of course yall would believe the one quack not even in his own field.

LINK /



125 Nobel laureates LINK

101 Nobel laureates LINK

76 Nobel laureates LINK


I guess all it would take is 1 climate scientist to tell you how eating horse deworming cream for Covid is stupid and you would finally believe them


Do any of them say what the "global" temperature is supposed to be?

I bet they didn't.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram