re: 4 Years On: More Damning Evidence COVID-1984 Was Synthesized In A Lab….

Sorry, had to run as I hit submit on the previous post not realizing it didn't post correctly. Fixed now.
Yeah, I never heard such until 3 years ago, but there are such doctors and there appears to be good reasons.
Good recent discussion

quote:

---

covid was man made as part of China’s attempt to gain superiority in weaponry; it was largely funded by the simpletons in the US health infrastructure (chiefly Fauci); and it was accidentally released by the incompetent ChiComs.

---

Incompetence alone does not account for the deliberate misinformation and outright propaganda dispensed by our nation’s public health apparatus about the origins of this virus. This was done with malice aforethought.

It “makes no sense” to release such a virus only if you hold the false assumption that we are dealing with people who operate from some moral or ethical framework that is based on logic, reason and good intentions. That is not the situation at all as these are depraved psychopaths intent on achieving their corrupt agenda regardless of the cost in human suffering and indeed death.

quote:

---

Please share said evidence with the grou

---

Maybe start by reading the Wall Street Journal article linked on the OP. Good lord.

quote:

---

Is this one of those confirmed conspiracy theories

---

Yes. It was debunked.

Your boy motown over here’s being next level contrarian on this day it appears. Like Thomas Jefferson said, nobody likes a contrarian.

quote:

---

Hognutz

---

That was painful to muddle through, H.
Just FYI, there is not a lot of grounded medical thought in their discussion.

For example, they discuss early papers studying CV19. Bailey comments on a Harcourt study ( LINK) attempting to isolate CV19. Bailey laments they "just assumed" the patient had CV19. That is 100% false.

The patient was diagnosed as CV19+ by a combination Hx/PEx and polymerase chain reaction testing in Washington state, as well as by confirmatory testing at the CDC. Bailey's claim would be bizarre for a first day Med School Freshman. For someone intimating expertise it is simply inexcusable.

The same is true for his analysis of the Michelle L. Holshue paper ( LINK). Holshue is a simple case report of the first known CV19 case in the US. The patient reported to clinic with a recent history of cough and subjective fever after traveling back from Wuhan.

Given his SxSx and travel Hx, various samples were sent to the CDC for PCR analysis. Swab samples came back CV19+. Later in his course he had some GI SxSx. Stool samples turned up CV19+. Five days into his hospital stay he developed pneumonia.

In contrast to Bailey's insinuations the PRMC medical staff just "assumed" CV19 was the source of pblms, the patient was initially treated for possible nosocomial bacterial pneumonia until cultures/testing established his LLL infiltrate was 2° to CV19.

Look, I will call a spade a spade. But most of what Cowan and Bailey espouse in that discussion is pure nonsense.

It certainly appears to be assumptions when claims rest on a unscientific method of isolation proving a virus exist in the first place. This is a focal point with the entire movement.
If you're so confident they're so wrong, perhaps you could reach out and challenge them, individually or as a group. They are practically begging for discussions, but very few are willing.
Keep in mind, atleast with Mark Bailey, and I believe his wife as well, both doctors who would have completely agreed with yours and the vast majority of doctors views prior to 2020.
So, they are hardly unqualified to comment.
I would love to see such a discussion.