- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jayden Daniels Meeting With The Saints
Posted on 3/3/24 at 8:02 pm to P bean
Posted on 3/3/24 at 8:02 pm to P bean
quote:
One, examples after 2000 are not ancient.
The new CBA changed the paradigm, so yeah, they are.
quote:
And dude ?? Youre trying to distunguish by how long they sat for????
Uh yeah, that's the point.
Page 1:
quote:
And bench Carr while his cap hit is over $50M/year for a couple of years?
Page 3
quote:
So he rides the bench during almost his entire rookie contract, or we bench Carr when his cap hit is over $50M for a few years?
Neither scenario is very optimal from a decision-making scenario.
How long he sits is crucial, b/c the +EV decision is to ride an elite QB on a rookie deal. You get 5 years of that, max, but more realistically 4.
Having him sit for 3-4 years destroys that value entirely, which makes it -EV.
For our specific situation, the EV of having the rookie play on that deal is completely offset and neutralized by Carr having the cap impact of a top tier starting QB for years 3 and 4 of that rookie deal.
Our cap situation making Carr unable to be cut destroys the only +EV scenario possible.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 3/3/24 at 10:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Having him sit for 3-4 years destroys that value entirely, which makes it -EV.
And Carr’s contract is for 2026. How many years is that from now? Not 3.
quote:
Uh yeah, that's the point.
No its not. Its your point. Which has nothing to do with the fact that teams draft young qbs as a backup plan when their qb is old.
And got nothing to do with the liklihood that the saints would take Daniels if there. Because they obviously would. Similar to how Jackosn got drafted as ins behind Flacco/heir apparent. Or any other of the list I posted already, with Jackson, Mahomes, Lance etc
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 10:07 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)