Started By
Message

re: Jayden Daniels Meeting With The Saints

Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4083 posts
Posted on 3/3/24 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Again 1 year So yeah, you just proved my point. Either ancient examples, examples of 1-year sits, OR the packers with Rodgers and Love.


One, examples after 2000 are not ancient.

Ancient would be examples from early NFL history - of which there are several, LOL.

As stated Unitas’s backup was groomed and was MVP, his name is Earl Morral. This is ancient.

And dude ?? Youre trying to distunguish by how long they sat for????

Disingenuous argument to say the least, and drafting a replacement qb to groom aint new.

We literally almost did it with Brees/Mahomes, teams draft replacement often, and it happens often. We signed Jameis and groomed him to replace Brees.

Its literally no secret that we want a talented young un with potential behind Carr.

quote:

Thanks for proving my point


I dont think you have a point, unless what youre trying to say is that the Saints would pass on J Daniels if he dropped.

If that is what youre saying then LOL, nice try.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 7:39 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425596 posts
Posted on 3/3/24 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

One, examples after 2000 are not ancient.

The new CBA changed the paradigm, so yeah, they are.

quote:

And dude ?? Youre trying to distunguish by how long they sat for????

Uh yeah, that's the point.

Page 1:

quote:

And bench Carr while his cap hit is over $50M/year for a couple of years?


Page 3

quote:

So he rides the bench during almost his entire rookie contract, or we bench Carr when his cap hit is over $50M for a few years?

Neither scenario is very optimal from a decision-making scenario.


How long he sits is crucial, b/c the +EV decision is to ride an elite QB on a rookie deal. You get 5 years of that, max, but more realistically 4.

Having him sit for 3-4 years destroys that value entirely, which makes it -EV.

For our specific situation, the EV of having the rookie play on that deal is completely offset and neutralized by Carr having the cap impact of a top tier starting QB for years 3 and 4 of that rookie deal.

Our cap situation making Carr unable to be cut destroys the only +EV scenario possible.
This post was edited on 3/3/24 at 8:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram