- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chevron’s $53 Billion Deal for Hess in Jeopardy on Possible Exxon Challenge
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:23 pm to ragincajun03
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:23 pm to ragincajun03
You own 30%, Exxon owns 45% and you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:29 pm to Capt ST
quote:
you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?
I would think that is dependent on the nature of your leasehold. Without supporting instruments, I really don’t know.
But I’m no title lawyer, those poor guys.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:31 am to Capt ST
quote:
You own 30%, Exxon owns 45% and you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?
Happens all the time in acquisitions. However, as others have stated, it depends on what the operating agreement states. Your standard, unedited AAPL JOA form, I THINK (it’s been a while since I read through one) allows for first right of refusal should a party decide to sell its interests in the leases/AMI area; however, I don’t believe that right applies should one of the parties be bought.
I’d imagine, though, that neither Exxon or Hess just simply went with the standard form and didn’t redline or amend anything.
This post was edited on 2/27/24 at 5:32 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News