Started By
Message

re: Chevron’s $53 Billion Deal for Hess in Jeopardy on Possible Exxon Challenge

Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by Capt ST
Hotel California
Member since Aug 2011
12902 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:23 pm to
You own 30%, Exxon owns 45% and you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?
Posted by Herschal
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2011
1588 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?


I would think that is dependent on the nature of your leasehold. Without supporting instruments, I really don’t know.

But I’m no title lawyer, those poor guys.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21461 posts
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:31 am to
quote:

You own 30%, Exxon owns 45% and you just think you can up and sell it without giving them first right of refusal?


Happens all the time in acquisitions. However, as others have stated, it depends on what the operating agreement states. Your standard, unedited AAPL JOA form, I THINK (it’s been a while since I read through one) allows for first right of refusal should a party decide to sell its interests in the leases/AMI area; however, I don’t believe that right applies should one of the parties be bought.

I’d imagine, though, that neither Exxon or Hess just simply went with the standard form and didn’t redline or amend anything.
This post was edited on 2/27/24 at 5:32 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram