- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the employee that shot the robber is in custody
Posted on 2/26/24 at 5:14 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Posted on 2/26/24 at 5:14 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Can we not agree that there is a difference between the mere taking of something of value and an actual, articulable threat of death or great bodily harm and that deadly force is reasonable to prevent one but not the other?
No.
When a person decides to take things from an innocent person, anything and everything that happens to the thief is fair game.
The Law may disagree, but thieves are the scum of the Earth and deserve no sympathy when killed in the course of their crimes.
1
Posted on 2/26/24 at 5:23 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
When a person decides to take things from an innocent person, anything and everything that happens to the thief is fair game.
The Law may disagree, but thieves are the scum of the Earth and deserve no sympathy when killed in the course of their crimes.
Perhaps. Does your position change with the relative value of the things taken? Do kids stealing candy bars deserve death? If not, where is the line for you?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News