- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So the employee that shot the robber is in custody
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:29 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:29 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
Sucky situation. Much as we hate crime, it’s never been morally or legally justifiable to try to kill someone for stealing. Whether punching through a barrier to steal some merchandise from a Walgreens or a glass case to steal some jewelry from a jewelry store, it’s not, in that moment, a threat of death or injury to someone. If the employee had moved to physically prevent the theft and the thief then threatened the employee, the analysis would be different.
Must be a lot of untrained posters giving you the DVs because you are 100% correct. I fully support 2A but the laws do not authorize lethal force for stealing if no threat to person is made. Anyone attending concealed carry training will tell you that.
2
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:30 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Must be a lot of untrained posters giving you the DVs because you are 100% correct.
Where were you trained?
Posted on 2/26/24 at 4:32 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
I fully support 2A but the laws do not authorize lethal force for stealing if no threat to person is made.
Since you apparently heard the audio, let us know what all was said. For sure no threats were made, according to you.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News