- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tort reform in Louisiana - you can only choose 3
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:06 pm to Wednesday
Posted on 2/19/24 at 9:06 pm to Wednesday
I agree that loser pays is bad. For a lot of the reasons you stated. But the real reason it makes no sense is because the plaintiff rarely "loses." In a rear end accident, you'll rarely see a 0. In those cases, the defendant will always have to pay attorneys fees.
However, having the ability to include it in an Offer of Judgment could make sense. If I send you an Offer for $400k and the jury awards less, having the other side pay fees would be a great way to encourage settlement. Same would go the other way.
However, having the ability to include it in an Offer of Judgment could make sense. If I send you an Offer for $400k and the jury awards less, having the other side pay fees would be a great way to encourage settlement. Same would go the other way.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News