Started By
Message

re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility

Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:51 am to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26824 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:51 am to
quote:

The Justices would probably say, “because time constraints;”

Its more "everything the attorneys are saying has been briefed no less than 4 times and we've read them all."

Oral argument is for the justices, not for the parties.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116379 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Oral argument is for the justices, not for the parties.



yup

Sometimes its just to send messages to other Justices as well
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44052 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Its more "everything the attorneys are saying has been briefed no less than 4 times and we've read them all."

Oral argument is for the justices, not for the parties.


That makes sense, and I appreciate that perspective.
I’d just like to see the Justices allow Mitchell to answer the actual question(s) they pose, irrespective of at what stage we are in the case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram