- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
has anyone actually defined what constitutes 'insurrection'
That's several analytical steps away from what the Court is seeming to focus on, at least initially.
They are always going to look for the threshold issues first, which in this case are at least (1a) state authority over ballot eligibility and (1b) the applicability of Section 3 to POTUS. If they find in favor of Trump on either of those things, they don't have to even get into "insurrection" if they don't want to.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:54 am
1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:01 am to Indefatigable
quote:
That's several analytical steps away from what the Court is seeming to focus on, at least initially.
thanx - that seems to be what is happening
but is not the core concern =
"first - is what happened on J6 really an insurrection - under what definition - under what determination - under what action taken in response?
"second - IF there really is a technical finding of 'yes - it was an insurrection' - THEN - did Trump participate in the 'insurrecction' or did he incite the 'insurrection'?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News