- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:49 am to BearCrocs
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:49 am to BearCrocs
quote:
Also, why are the justices not letting the attorney respond in full? They keep cutting him off.. Jesus
That’s winding me up too.
The Justices would probably say, “because time constraints;” but common sense tells me they could find more natural/appropriate time points to stop counsel from responding or to ask for clarification.
This is what happens when you have too many cooks in the kitchen—each one thinks what s/he has to say is more important what anyone else thinks.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am
2
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am to EKG
quote:
That’s winding me up too.
Is this the first time yall have ever watched an Appeal argument?
That's how this works.
This isn't statements or briefs, they already have all that written out.
This is a totally different thing just to get specific questions and arguments out, and sometimes it is a peppering of questions and you have to be as concise as possible
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:51 am to EKG
quote:
The Justices would probably say, “because time constraints;”
Its more "everything the attorneys are saying has been briefed no less than 4 times and we've read them all."
Oral argument is for the justices, not for the parties.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News