- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:46 am to Lsupimp
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:46 am to Lsupimp
quote:
“ Insurrection “
just tuned in to this thing - has anyone actually defined what constitutes 'insurrection' ???
How the hell can this thing survive at ANY level - what am I missing here
Is it really up to some official in some podunk state just decide that someone is an "insurrectionist?"
Could not a case be made that Biden is 'insurrecting' - not to mention 'treason' and 'bribery' - at this very moment based on their determination of what he 'meant' to do - or was 'alleged to have done." ???
This make ZERO sense to me on ANY level -
1
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
has anyone actually defined what constitutes 'insurrection'
That's several analytical steps away from what the Court is seeming to focus on, at least initially.
They are always going to look for the threshold issues first, which in this case are at least (1a) state authority over ballot eligibility and (1b) the applicability of Section 3 to POTUS. If they find in favor of Trump on either of those things, they don't have to even get into "insurrection" if they don't want to.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:54 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News